Text Box:    8

           The gray wolf population is declining, says Doug Smith, the coordinator of the reintroduction efforts and leader of the Yellowstone Wolf Project that studies and manages the wolves.  Wolves are killing each other at a higher frequency to complete for elk, their primary food source, which is less abundant now, he says.  “The good times are over,” Smith says.  His annual census of the parks wolf population is expected to be the lowest in 10 years, he said.  Smith is still gathering data but says the number of gray wolves in the park will be 116, a 33% drop from 2003, when the population was at an all-time high of 174.

           While parvo-virus and mange continue to reduce the population, part of this year’s decline can be traced to the fact that in 2008, wolves lost protection in the Northern Rockies under the Endangered Species Act.  Wolves , like all wildlife, are protected inside the park, but when they roam beyond the borders, they fall into the state’s wildlife management practices.  Idaho and Montana, which borders Yellowstone permitted hunting of wolves this fall.  Idaho recently extended it hunt until March.

           The Yellowstone pack hardest hit by the hunt is nicknamed Cottonwood. Hunters killed four members of the pack, including the breeding female, her mate and her daughter in a Montana wilderness area bordering the park.  “The wolves have it hard enough inside the park,” says Rolf Peterson, a wildlife biologist at Michigan Technological University.  “The Yellowstone wolves should be treated like national treasures and protected.”

           Several conservation groups, including the Sierra Club and Defenders of Wildlife, have joined in a lawsuit and argue that the Northern Rockies wolves should be put back on the endangered species list.  If wolves are relisted, hunting would be banned.  “We’re very much against the hunting of wolves at this time,” says Jamie Rappaport Clark, executive Vice President of Defenders of Wildlife. 

           The group faults the states” management plans to reduce wolves from 1650 to 450.  State officials state the need to balance the wolves with the habitat and other wildlife.  “It probably sound counterintuitive to kill wildlife to protect wildlife,” said Caroline Sime, wolf program coordinator for Montana Fish and Wildlife.  “We haven’t opened the flood-floodgates to killing wolves, but having wolves, livestock and other wild game on the same landscape in Montana is tricky.  It’s a very tenuous balance.”

           Montana Fish and Wildlife closed the hunting season early in the area where the Yellowstone wolves were killed and plans to wait until spring to decide about next seasons wolf hunt—if there is one.

           Wildlife biologist Petson says the wolves in the northern part of the park will need to turn to prey other than elk, which he says will help Montana because it doen’t want the animals migrating into the state where they spread disease to cattle.  “The wolves are going to have to learn to hunt bison,” he said.

           The winter elk numbers in the park have dropped from 17,000 to 6, 800 since wolves were reintroduced.  Hunting and weather factors have also taken a toll, Smith says.  The remaining elk are stronger, he says, making hunting harder for wolves.    “I’ve seen three cases this fall where a pack of wolves have gone after elk and the elk puts up a tremendous fight,” Smith says.  “I’ve never seen anything like that before.  The wolves are risking their lives to hunt and eat.”

           Peterson, author of The Wolves of Isle Royale, a 50-year study of the wolf packs in the Lake Superior region of the country, says other wolves will move into the territory dominated by the Cottonwood pack and the overall health of the wolves in Yellowstone is good.  “This is just part of the ebb and flow,” he says.

           The roadside spectators still have plenty to see even as the wolf population drops in the park.  “This is still the best place in the USA to see wolves.” Smith says.  “It’s just that there’s an equilibrium now between the predator and the prey.”           Reprinted from USA Today.

 

Text Box: 	YELLOWSTONES NATIONAL PARK, WY. - A dozen tourists in parkas huddle around wolf researcher Colby Anton in the northern range of park, an area famous for gray wolves, to catch a glimpse of images on his digital camera.
	The wolf watchers have become a familiar scene since the animals were reintroduced into the park in 1995 after being gone for nearly 70 years.  The wolves have fueled a $35 million-a-year industry as cars full of tourists spend dawn to dusk looking for wolves and trading tales.
	Now the tales are changing.  The image on Anton’s camera is of a dead wolf he discovered on an 18-mile hike in the high country of the park.  “We found it partially buried under the snow, did a necropsy and concluded a wolf from another pack killed the wolf,” he says.
Text Box: (Continued from Page 4 )
numbers that influenced federal and then state authorities to take the bald eagle off the endangered species list,.
	Jody Millar is a biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Rock Island,.  She said the federal agency has been working with the  state since those low-number days to collect data about nesting sites.  While she is aware of Ingram’s objections to de-listing eagles, she politely disagrees.  “We want species to on the list that are truly threatened with endangerment.  Just because it’s a great species doesn’t mean it needs to be listed,” she says.  “In fact, the bald eagle has its own act, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.  It’s an extremely protected species.”
	Winter figures can be problematic, she says, because weather conditions may drive eagles down from Canada or cause them to concentrate wherever there is food.  The general assumption behind nesting data is that any time an adult bird is seen on the nest, it is one half of a pair.  However, the nests are not checked regularly.  “With the success of the bald eagle population, that became a very expensive and time-consuming proposition,” she says.  “What we are doing now is sampling them.”
	To Ingram, that’s why the nesting numbers are “a sham.”  He says his numbers are based on eagles actually seen, while the Fish & Wildlife numbers are compiled “by someone sitting behind a desk.”  But the Endangered Species Protection Board looks at several numbers, including midwinter counts, breeding season counts and nesting data.  It recommended that the bird be de-listed in Illinois, as well.  “It becomes problematic to use just one or the other,” says board Director Anne Mankowski, offering the report headlined “Species Recovery Success Story,” which outlined the reasoning.  “I certainly do not discount his data,” Mankowski says.  “We do seek additional data to inform ourselves.  Our compilation does not agree with what he presents.”
	It appears eagle-watching is a more complex endeavor than a simple drive up the river.  Matching up the different counts as they are compiled this spring should be interesting.  It also appears, however, all parties do agree on at least one thing: Bald eagles are a symbol of conservation efforts worth making.  “We should be proud as a people.  We recognized the impact we had.  We realized we needed to change our ways,” Clay says.  “It’s not Text Box: Wolves Decline in Yellowstone
Population falls as animals lose protection, kill each other in battle for food
By Janice Lloyd